2005-10-26

Official - Iraq was safer under Saddam

I'm about to quote from an article written by Jim Krane of the Associated Press. Yeah - I still hate being right:

"Most Iraqis remain less secure than they were under Saddam, less secure even than they were in the first year of the American occupation," said James Dobbins, a former Bush administration envoy to Afghanistan and veteran diplomat who now directs the Rand Corp.'s International Security and Defense Policy Center.

Dobbins supplied figures from the Baghdad morgue that show 1,800 violent deaths in 2002, Saddam Hussein's last full year in power. That number jumped beyond 6,000 in 2003, the first year of the American occupation, and topped 8,000 last year, he said.

"Under Saddam, you usually were OK as long as you kept your mouth shut," said Joost Hiltermann, an Iraq analyst with the International Crisis Group. "Now you might get hurt or even killed almost arbitrarily, given the absence of rule of law, the sectarian fighting, insurgent actions and U.S. carelessness in responding to attacks."

4 comments:

Craig Schwarze said...

1948 Headline in Der Berliner - "Official: Germans more prosperous under Nazi regime"

The big question being - so what?

Craig Schwarze said...

You might be intersted in this site -

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/

Some consider it to be the most accurate count of civilian casualties in the war. It currently estimates between 26,000 and 30,000 deaths.

Theteak said...

I was going to interview some Kurds to ask them what they think about this issue.
But they WERE ALL DEAD.

Craig Schwarze said...

The Washington Post publishes a report showing showing the number of deaths due to Insurgents is about 26,000

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/29/AR2005102900878.html