2008-09-03

An evangelical who is unhappy with Palin

This is from Sojourner, aka Brad Williams, a Pastor from Alabama:

I believe that the evangelical world, at least the complementarian evangelical world is smiling right now with Senator McCain's pick of Gov. Sarah Palin. Except, I have the sinking feeling that it may be one of those pasted-on fake smiles that attempts to mask the turning of the mental wheels.

First of all, we evangelicals like Gov. Palin. She's pro-life. She has five children. She chose not to abort her Down's Syndrome son. She seems like a happy person. Plus, rumor has it that her husband has won the Iditarod four times, which means he's a manly man at least. She seems like a great lady.

So why is the smile turning to a look of concern? Because she has five children, one of them is a special needs child less than five months old. Evangelicals has spent the last forty years trying to convince moms that the home is the highest calling of her life. How does a woman be VP of the USA and still be mommy to five children? How is our whole-hearted support for her candidacy not akin to 'taking back' all of our ballyhoo about women being needed at home more than the office?

Now we find out that her seventeen year old daughter is pregnant and planning to marry. How will Gov. Palin find time to guide her daughter through this process and still maintain the rigorous schedule of the office of Vice-President?

As much as I like Gov. Palin, as much as I admire her down-to-earthness, her pro-life stance, and her general winsomeness, I am not happy about this choice for Vice-President. I think it goes against much of what I have been attempting to teach the men and women of our church, and it goes against much of the teaching that I have heard from some of the same folks who support this move. How am I supposed to convince the ladies of my church that it is nobler to relinquish career and income for the sake of educating and mothering her children while waving the banner for Gov. Palin? It smacks of political expediency, and I am afraid that it makes evangelicals look like the glassy-eyed Republican 'yes-men' that we are often accused of being.

I am troubled by this move, and I am more than a little dissappointed with the way it has been treated by most evangelical pundits. That is, we have praised her virtues as a mother...and yet we have been silent on why this run for VP is not the best thing she can do for her children. And if it is, why have we so consistently and adamantly insisted that the best place for a mother is in the home?

2 comments:

BLBeamer said...

Two thoughts:

1. Sojourner is also the name of a Christian periodical with a liberal POV. That's what I thought I was going to when I saw the link. I was surprised when it was not since I've read the other Sojourner before.

2. This is probably the first time in his life that Brad Williams agrees almost 100% with the National Organization of Women. The only part they disagree on is the "I respect Sarah Palin, but..." part. NOW doesn't bother with expressing their respect for Sarah Palin. They just want her to go back home.

Coffee Bean said...

Oh boy.

We made the decision for me to stay home with our children because we could. Not everyone is afforded that luxury. And not every woman is called to do that. What about Deborah in the Old Testament?

What do people like this propose? Not voting at all? Voting for Obama?

Blech.