Hold on to that thought. Here's Ban Ki-moon, the Secretary-General of the United Nations:
The price of food is soaring. The threat of hunger and malnutrition is growing. Millions of the world's most vulnerable people are at risk.Some interesting ideas there from Mr Moon.
An effective and urgent response is needed.
The first of the Millennium Development Goals, set by world leaders at the U.N. summit in 2000, aims to reduce the proportion of hungry people by half by 2015. This was already a major challenge, not least in Africa, where many nations have fallen behind. But we are also facing a perfect storm of new challenges.
The prices of basic staples -- wheat, corn, rice -- are at record highs, up 50 percent or more in the past six months. Global food stocks are at historic lows. The causes range from rising demand in major economies such as India and China to climate- and weather-related events such as hurricanes, floods and droughts that have devastated harvests in many parts of the world. High oil prices have increased the cost of transporting food and purchasing fertilizer. Some experts say the rise of biofuels has reduced the amount of food available for humans.
This is the new face of hunger, increasingly affecting communities that had previously been protected. Inevitably, it is the "bottom billion" who are hit hardest: people living on one dollar a day or less. When people are that poor, and inflation erodes their meager earnings, they generally do one of two things: They buy less food, or they buy cheaper, less nutritious food. The result is the same -- more hunger and less chance of a healthy future. The U.N. World Food Program is seeing families that previously could afford a diverse, nutritious diet dropping to one staple and cutting their meals from three to two or one a day.
To be honest, a world-wide increase in food prices was always "on my scanner" as it were, since the price of oil would naturally affect food production world-wide. What I didn't expect, though, was prices going so high so quickly.
Of course, with a devaluing US Dollar, all commodities that use that currency in international trade would naturally increase in price. The problem, though, is that the price of food (as well as oil) has increased way beyond the range you'd expect if it was just currency problems.
From an economic point of view, there are a number of reasons why food prices have increased:
- There is increased demand. This means that the world is demanding more food and the world's farmers are struggling to keep up with this demand. Certainly there has been no massive and sudden increase in world population in recent times, so this increase in demand may be coming from people who have decided to increase the amount of calories they consume. Mr Moon suggests China and India are driving this demand. The good news is that this sort of price increase will eventually cause its own solution - prices will drop when people can't afford to purchase the goods any more. The bad news is that the people who decide to cut down on their food intake may be the very people who can't afford to, namely the "bottom billion." An increase is food production will help rectify this situation, but that assumes, of course, that the grain market will function the way a market is expected to. If food producers are unable to increase their yield, the problem will go deeper.
- There is speculation going on. This means that the people around the world with lots of money have decided to buy up stocks of food and keep them in the hope that they can sell it at a higher price. Speculation exists in every market, but one of the natural results of speculation is that the goods being speculated upon begin to pile up somewhere. If the world's food market is suffering from speculation, then somewhere there is a lot of food that is not being eaten. So far, I have not heard any reports of massive grain stocks being hoarded. The good news is that, eventually, speculation results in a market correction whereby prices return to a more sustainable level and the hoarded food eventually floods the market (which is bad for producers, but good for consumers). The bad news is that people may die of starvation while food remains hoarded by rich speculators.
- There are supply problems. This means that the world's food producers are simply unable to grow enough food to meet demand. There may be specific reasons for this, including droughts or floods affecting crop yields. Mr Moon suggests that the creation of the bio-fuel market (whereby corn is grown by American farmers to be turned into ethanol and then added to gasoline) has reduced the supply of grain grown for food. This is one of the more popular reasons touted throughout the internet these days, but I am finding it to "trendy" to be believable - why would American farmers cause such major differences in international grain prices? Is the amount of food grown in America so massive as to affect the market in that way? Of course, another reason Mr Moon suggests is that global warming has reduced world-wide crop yields. This is a nightmare scenario which will result in massive malnutrition and starvation amongst the "bottom billion".
My suspicion is that global warming has already begun to bite and grain production is dropping because of world-wide environmental changes. That's only a suspicion, however, and I will happily change my opinion if the data contradicts me. I certainly hope it does.